Off-page SEO is everything you do beyond your own website to convince search engines, and increasingly AI answer engines, that your brand deserves to be trusted and recommended. If on-page SEO is about making a page as clear and useful as possible, off-page SEO is about the reputation that page carries into the search results. It is the difference between claiming you are an authority and having the rest of the web confirm it.

For most competitive queries, that external validation is decisive. Links from other sites, coverage in the press, mentions of your brand, reviews, and the signals that build genuine authority are what separate the pages that rank from the thousands that never surface at all. Google has spent more than two decades refining how it reads these signals, and the large language models behind tools like AI Overviews and ChatGPT lean on many of the same reputation cues when they decide which sources to cite.

This guide is the map. It covers what off-page SEO is, why it still decides who wins, how Google and AI systems interpret off-page signals, and the core pillars worth investing in: links and link building, digital PR, brand mentions, E-E-A-T and entity authority, local signals, and community. Along the way it links out to deeper cluster guides on each tactic, sets out how to measure progress, explains what to avoid, and finishes with a roadmap you can follow. We build links for a living, so the perspective here is an agency one, but the aim is to be genuinely useful and honest about what actually works.

What off-page SEO actually means

On-page SEO covers the things you control directly on a page: the words, headings, internal links, images, structured data, and how well the content answers a query. Technical SEO covers the plumbing: crawlability, indexing, site speed, mobile rendering, and site architecture. Off-page SEO is the third pillar, and it covers the signals that happen elsewhere on the web and point back to you. In practice that means earning links from other websites, being written about by journalists and bloggers, having your brand named in relevant conversations, collecting reviews, and building the kind of reputation that makes both people and algorithms treat you as a credible source.

The simplest way to hold the distinction in your head is this: on-page and technical SEO make a page eligible to rank, while off-page SEO helps decide how far it climbs. You can publish the most thorough article on a subject, mark it up perfectly, and load it in under a second, and it can still sit on page three because a dozen competitors carry more external authority. Equally, no amount of off-page work rescues a page that does not answer the query or that search engines cannot crawl. The three disciplines are partners, not substitutes.

If you want the ground-level definition first, our explainer on what backlinks are and how you earn them is a useful companion to this section, because links remain the most measurable and influential part of off-page SEO. That said, off-page is broader than links alone. A brand mentioned repeatedly by trusted publications, recommended in a niche community, and reviewed well by customers is sending authority signals even where no clickable link exists.

It also helps to separate off-page SEO from public relations and marketing generally. There is heavy overlap: a great PR campaign produces coverage that doubles as off-page SEO, and word of mouth builds the branded search demand that Google reads as popularity. But off-page SEO has a specific goal, which is to influence how search and AI systems judge your authority and relevance. Keeping that goal in view stops off-page work drifting into vanity activity that looks busy but moves no rankings.

Why off-page signals still decide who wins

For all the algorithm changes of the last decade, external authority remains one of the strongest predictors of who ranks. Google has never hidden this. When one analysis of around 14 billion pages looked at how much content earns traffic, it found that 96.55% of them get no organic traffic from Google, and a shortage of links was one of the three most common reasons. Backlinks have repeatedly been described by Google representatives as among the most important ranking signals, and independent studies keep landing on the same conclusion.

That is not a coincidence. A link is a vote that a real site chose to cast, and it is expensive to fake at scale without leaving footprints. Brand mentions, reviews, and citations work similarly: they are hard to manufacture convincingly, which is exactly why they carry weight. This is the heart of the case for why backlinks carry so much weight in rankings, and why serious off-page work concentrates resources there rather than on signals that are cheap to game.

It helps to be clear-eyed about the hierarchy, because not every off-page signal pulls the same weight, and some that get a lot of attention are not confirmed ranking factors at all. Editorial links from relevant, trusted sites and genuine earned media do the heavy lifting. Brand mentions and entity authority matter and are growing more important. Local signals decide local visibility. Social engagement, by contrast, has never been confirmed as a direct ranking factor, however useful it is for distribution and demand. The chart below sets out how we weight these signals in practice.

The other reason off-page still matters is competitive. In most commercial niches, the pages you are trying to outrank already have strong content and clean technical foundations. Once everyone has done the on-page basics, external authority becomes the tie-breaker. This is also why off-page work compounds: a page that earns links and mentions tends to attract more of them, because it now ranks higher, gets seen more, and becomes the reference other writers cite. Starting early and staying consistent beats sporadic bursts. None of this means chasing links for their own sake. The goal is authority that is deserved, built on content and products worth referencing, but pretending you can ignore off-page signals and win competitive terms on content alone is, for most sites, wishful thinking.

How Google and AI answer engines read off-page signals

Google does not expose a single authority score, but it does use many signals to work out whether a page and the site behind it are trustworthy. Its guidance frames this around E-E-A-T: experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trustworthiness. Google is explicit that of these, trust is most important, and that E-E-A-T itself is not a single ranking factor but a lens its systems approximate through many smaller signals. A great deal of what feeds that lens is off-page: who links to you, who mentions you, whether the author is recognised elsewhere, and whether the wider web treats your brand as a known entity.

Links and mentions are how Google connects your brand to topics and to other trusted entities. When authoritative sites in your field reference you, they are effectively vouching that you belong in that conversation. Author authority works the same way: a byline that appears across respected publications builds a recognisable expert entity, which is far more persuasive than a claim of expertise on your own About page. This is why building genuine reputation off-site, and not just links to a URL, is now central to the discipline.

AI answer engines have raised the stakes. Tools like Google’s AI Overviews and ChatGPT synthesise an answer and then cite a handful of sources, and they lean on the same reputation cues: which brands are frequently mentioned, cited and linked in connection with a topic. If your brand is the one the web keeps associating with a subject, you are far likelier to be surfaced and named. We go deeper into this in our guide to how search engines and AI assistants choose which sources to trust, but the short version is that off-page authority is becoming the currency of AI visibility too.

Reassuringly, there is no separate playbook to chase. Google has said there are no additional requirements to appear in AI Overviews or AI Mode beyond the SEO fundamentals that already work, which means the off-page authority you build for classic search is the same authority that earns AI citations. The practical takeaway is to stop thinking of off-page SEO as getting links and start thinking of it as building a well-referenced entity. Links are the most measurable expression of that, but the underlying goal is to be the brand, author and site that the trusted web, and the models trained on it, keep pointing to.

The core pillars of off-page SEO

Off-page SEO is easier to execute when you treat it as a set of connected pillars rather than a single tactic. Each pillar sends a different flavour of authority signal, and a mature strategy works across several at once so that no single channel carries all the risk.

The first and heaviest pillar is backlinks and link building, which is broad enough to warrant its own complete guide to building links. The second is digital PR and earned media, where you create newsworthy assets and pitch journalists to win coverage on high-authority publications. The third is brand mentions, both linked and unlinked, which build the entity associations that search and AI systems rely on. The fourth is E-E-A-T and author or entity authority, which is less a channel than the outcome the other pillars feed. The fifth is local signals: your Google Business Profile, citations and reviews. The sixth is audience and community signals, from niche forums to social platforms, which drive the branded demand and distribution that make everything else work harder.

You do not need to attack all six with equal force. A local service business should weight local signals and reviews heavily. A software company competing on informational queries should weight links and digital PR. An ecommerce brand needs product-level links and strong reviews. The right mix depends on your market, your competitors and where your current profile is weakest. What every plan shares is a bias toward signals that are hard to fake, because those are the ones that hold up over time and survive algorithm updates. The rest of this guide takes each pillar in turn, starting with the engine room: links.

Backlinks and link building: the engine room

If off-page SEO has an engine room, this is it. A backlink is simply a link from another website to yours, and Google treats each one as a signal of relevance and trust, weighted by the quality and topical fit of the site giving it. Not all links are equal, which is why understanding the different types of backlinks matters before you spend a penny chasing them. An editorial link earned inside the body of a relevant article is worth far more than a link in a footer, a low-quality directory, or a paid placement that passes ranking credit against Google’s rules.

The single most useful mental model is quality over quantity. One link from a respected, topically relevant publication can outperform hundreds from thin, unrelated sites. If you internalise one filter, make it this: does the linking page have a real audience, real editorial standards and genuine relevance to your subject? Our breakdown of what makes a backlink genuinely high quality runs through the attributes that matter, from relevance and traffic to placement and the content around the link.

A second model is the difference between total backlinks and referring domains. Ten links from ten different respected sites almost always beat ten links from one site, because each new linking domain is a fresh vote. Large-scale studies bear this out: pages that rank well tend to have links from more distinct domains, not just more links overall. When you plan a campaign, the number to grow is referring domains from quality sources, not raw link count.

From there it becomes a question of method. There are dozens of legitimate ways to earn links, and our overview of the practical ways to earn backlinks maps the main ones. They fall into a few families: creating assets so useful that people cite them, earning coverage through outreach and PR, contributing content to other sites, and reclaiming or upgrading links that already exist. The following sections take the most effective tactics in turn. One honest caveat before we do: link building is slow, and the tactics that produce durable results are the ones that require effort, such as original research, real relationships and genuinely useful content. Shortcuts that promise hundreds of links overnight almost always rely on schemes that Google is very good at discounting, and sometimes penalising.

Anchor text and link attributes

Two technical details shape how much value a link passes: its anchor text and its rel attributes. Both are worth understanding, because getting them wrong is a common and avoidable source of trouble.

Anchor text is the visible, clickable text of a link. It gives readers and search engines a clue about the destination, so it carries descriptive weight. The trap is over-optimisation: if a suspicious share of your inbound links use the exact commercial phrase you want to rank for, the pattern looks manufactured, because natural link profiles are messy. Real links use your brand name, the raw URL, the article title and generic phrases like this study far more often than exact-match keywords. Our guide to anchor text covers how to keep that distribution natural, and why branded and unoptimised anchors should dominate a healthy profile.

The second detail is the rel attribute, which tells Google how to treat a link. A standard editorial link passes ranking credit. Links that are advertisements, sponsorships or paid placements should be qualified with a rel attribute such as sponsored, and user-generated links like blog comments should use ugc, so that neither passes ranking credit. The nofollow value signals that Google should not associate your site with the linked page. Understanding the difference between dofollow and nofollow links matters for two reasons: you want your earned editorial links to be followed, and you want any paid or sponsored links you accept or place to be tagged correctly so neither party breaches Google’s policies.

A practical note: a natural profile contains plenty of nofollow, ugc and sponsored links, and that is healthy rather than a problem. Nofollow links from prominent places still drive traffic, build brand awareness and often lead to followed links later. Chasing an unnaturally high ratio of followed, exact-match links is one of the clearest footprints of manipulation. The goal is a profile that looks like what it should be: the by-product of real people referencing a real brand in the ways real people do.

Link building tactics worth your time

No single tactic builds a link profile. The strongest campaigns combine several, matched to the site, the budget and the kind of pages you need to strengthen. Here are the tactics that consistently earn their place, each of which we cover in depth elsewhere.

Guest posting means writing genuinely useful articles for other reputable sites in your field, with a natural link back where it fits the content. Done well, on sites with real audiences and editorial standards, it remains one of the most reliable ways to earn relevant links and reach new readers. Done badly, on any site that will publish anything for a fee, it is a fast route to footprints Google ignores. Our guide to guest posting draws the line between the two.

Niche edits, sometimes called link insertions, place your link inside an existing, already-indexed article rather than a new post. They can be efficient, because the host page may already have authority and traffic, but they are also easy to abuse. The comparison in niche edits versus guest posts helps you decide which suits a given target, and why the quality of the host page matters more than the method.

Resource page link building targets pages that exist specifically to list useful references on a topic. If you have created something genuinely worth listing, a polite, relevant pitch to the page owner is a natural fit that benefits their readers. It is one of the cleaner tactics, because the link is editorially justified by design, as our walkthrough of earning links from resource pages explains.

Broken link building is a close cousin: you find a dead link on a relevant page and suggest your working resource as the replacement. It works because you are solving a real problem for the site owner rather than simply asking for a favour, and the method in our broken link building guide scales well when paired with good prospecting. Beyond these, the skyscraper approach involves creating a clearly better version of content that already attracts links, then reaching out to the sites linking to the weaker original, while blogger outreach builds ongoing relationships with the writers in your space. The common thread across all of them is that the link is a by-product of offering something worth linking to. Tactics that skip that step, buying links purely for ranking credit or spinning up low-value content at scale, are the ones that carry risk and tend to decay.

Digital PR and earned media

Digital PR is where link building and traditional public relations meet, and for competitive niches it is the single most powerful off-page tactic. The idea is to create something genuinely newsworthy, such as original research, a data study, expert commentary, a striking visual or a timely reaction, and then pitch it to journalists and editors so they cover it and link to you. Because the resulting links sit inside editorial coverage on high-authority publications, they are exactly the kind of hard-to-fake signals that search engines and AI systems value most. Our overview of digital PR for SEO explains how campaigns are built and why they compound.

The mechanics matter, though, and most campaigns fail on execution rather than idea. Journalists receive hundreds of pitches, so standing out means a story that fits their beat, a clear hook, data they can cite, and an email that respects their time. This craft of pitching journalists effectively is what separates campaigns that earn dozens of quality links from those that earn silence. Relationships help, as does timing a story to a moment when it is already on editors’ minds.

One accessible on-ramp is reactive commentary. Services such as Featured, which now runs the long-standing HARO service, connect journalists who need expert quotes with sources who can provide them. When a reporter is writing about your field and you supply a sharp, quotable answer quickly, you can earn a citation, and often a link, on a publication you could never pitch cold. It rewards speed, genuine expertise and concision, and it is one of the few tactics a small team can start this week with no budget beyond time.

It is worth being realistic about outcomes. Not every campaign lands, coverage can be unpredictable, and a single big story often does more for your authority than a dozen minor ones. But when a data-led campaign is picked up by a major title, the effect ripples: other outlets cover the same story, the original coverage gets syndicated, and your brand becomes associated with the topic in exactly the way that builds entity authority. That is why digital PR increasingly sits at the centre of serious off-page strategies rather than at the edges. It builds links, brand awareness and topical authority in a single motion, which is a rare efficiency in this discipline.

Brand mentions, linked and unlinked

Not every valuable off-page signal is a clickable link. Search engines can recognise when your brand is named even without a hyperlink, and these unlinked mentions help build the entity associations that underpin E-E-A-T and increasingly drive AI citations. When respected sites, forums and publications keep naming your brand in connection with a topic, that repetition tells search and AI systems that you are a known, relevant entity, whether or not each mention links to you.

This is why brand building and off-page SEO are converging. The more your brand is discussed, reviewed and referenced, the more branded searches you generate, and branded search demand is itself a signal of prominence. It also makes every link you do earn more powerful, because links from a recognised brand in a space carry more weight than links from an unknown one.

There is a practical opportunity hiding in unlinked mentions. If a publication has already named your brand or cited your data without linking, a polite request to add a link is one of the highest-conversion outreach tasks in the discipline. The writer already knows and rates you, so you are simply asking them to make an existing reference clickable. Our guide to reclaiming unlinked mentions and lost links covers how to find these opportunities at scale, including mentions of your brand, your executives, your data, and images or content others have used without attribution.

The same logic applies to links that once existed and have since broken or been dropped, perhaps because a page was redesigned or migrated. Recovering them is usually far easier than earning new ones. Set up monitoring for your brand name and key assets so you learn about mentions as they happen, then treat reclamation as a standing, low-effort part of your programme rather than a one-off project. It is unglamorous work, but the return on time is among the best in off-page SEO, precisely because you are converting reputation you have already earned into signals search engines can act on.

Local off-page signals

For any business that serves a physical area, local off-page signals are their own pillar, and they behave differently from ordinary organic ranking. Google’s local results draw on a distinct set of factors, which it summarises as relevance, distance, and prominence. Relevance is how well your profile matches the search; distance is how close you are to the searcher; and prominence reflects how well known and well regarded your business is, informed partly by how many sites link to you and how many reviews you have.

Your Google Business Profile is the hub. A complete, accurate, actively managed profile, with correct categories, hours, photos and posts, is the foundation of local visibility. Google is clear that there is no way to pay for a better local ranking, so the work is about genuine signals rather than shortcuts. Reviews are central: more reviews and positive ratings can help local ranking, and responding to them shows you value customer feedback, so a steady, honest review-generation habit pays off directly.

Citations are the local equivalent of brand mentions: consistent listings of your business name, address and phone number across directories, maps and industry platforms. Consistency matters more than volume, because conflicting details undermine the trust these citations are meant to build. Get your core listings accurate and matching, and you remove a common drag on local performance.

Local links round out the picture, and they are often easier to earn than national ones. Sponsoring a local event, partnering with nearby businesses, joining a chamber of commerce, or being featured in regional press all produce relevant, trusted links that also reinforce your local prominence. Our guide to building links for local businesses sets out tactics that suit smaller budgets and geographies. Taken together, an accurate profile, a healthy review flow, consistent citations and a handful of genuine local links will outperform almost any amount of manipulation, and they compound in the same way as the rest of off-page SEO.

Audience and community signals

The final pillar is the softest to measure and the easiest to misunderstand. Audience and community signals include social media engagement, discussion in niche forums and communities such as Reddit, newsletter reach, and the general buzz around your brand. It is important to be precise here: social signals like shares and likes have never been confirmed as direct Google ranking factors, and you should treat any claim that they are with caution.

So why include them in an off-page guide? Because they drive the things that do move rankings. Content that spreads on social and in communities gets in front of the writers, journalists and site owners who link. A brand that people discuss generates branded search demand, which is a genuine signal of prominence. And communities are increasingly where AI systems, and Google itself, source real, first-hand opinions, which is why forum threads now appear so often in results and AI answers. Being genuinely present and helpful in the communities that matter to your audience is therefore off-page work, even though no ranking algorithm counts an upvote directly.

The honest framing is this: treat community and social as distribution and demand generation, not as a ranking lever you can pull. Use them to amplify the assets your PR and content teams produce, to build relationships with the people who link and cite, and to listen for the mentions and questions you can turn into coverage. Measured that way, they earn their place. Measured as a direct ranking tactic, they will disappoint. The brands that get the most SEO value from community are the ones that show up to be useful rather than to extract links, because that reputation is what eventually converts into the mentions, citations and links that search and AI systems actually reward.

How to measure off-page SEO

You cannot manage what you do not measure, and off-page SEO has a specific set of metrics worth watching, plus several vanity numbers worth ignoring. Start with the distinction that matters most: referring domains versus total backlinks. Referring domains counts the number of unique websites linking to you, and it is a far better health metric than raw backlink count, because a hundred links from one site are worth less than links from a hundred sites. Track referring domains from quality sources over time as your primary growth number.

Authority metrics like Domain Rating and Domain Authority are useful, but only as filters, not goals. These are third-party scores invented by tool providers, not numbers Google uses. They are handy for quickly judging whether a prospective linking site is worth pursuing, and for spotting trends, but obsessing over moving your own score by a point or two misses the point. The aim is rankings, traffic, conversions and citations, and authority scores are a proxy at best.

The evidence for focusing on links is strong. In a study of 11.8 million search results, the top-ranked page had on average 3.8x more backlinks than the pages ranking from positions two to ten, and pages with links from more distinct domains consistently ranked higher. Numbers like these are why referring domains sit at the centre of most off-page scorecards.

Beyond link metrics, watch organic visibility for your target keywords, referral traffic from the links and coverage you earn, branded search volume as a proxy for prominence, and, increasingly, whether your brand is cited in AI answers. For a fuller framework, our guide to the link building KPIs worth tracking sets out what to report and what to leave out. Competitor backlink analysis belongs here too: studying which domains link to the sites already outranking you reveals both the links you are missing and a realistic bar for what a winning profile looks like in your niche, and a good backlink tool makes that gap analysis straightforward. Finally, measure over the right horizon. Off-page results are slow and lumpy: a single piece of coverage can arrive months after the pitch, and rankings often move in steps rather than a smooth line. Judge campaigns on quarters, not days, and on the quality and relevance of what you earn, not on hitting an arbitrary monthly link quota.

What to avoid: link schemes, PBNs, and bought links

The flip side of off-page SEO is knowing which tactics put you at risk. Google’s spam policies are explicit that link spam means creating links primarily to manipulate search rankings, and sites that violate the policies may rank lower or be removed from results altogether. That is the line you are working to stay on the right side of.

The clearest violations are link schemes: buying or selling links that pass ranking credit, large-scale link exchanges, automated link generation, and low-value content produced mainly to host links. Private blog networks, or PBNs, are a particularly common trap. A PBN is a set of sites someone controls purely to link to their own or clients’ properties, and while they can work briefly, Google has decades of experience detecting the footprints they leave, from shared hosting and ownership to unnatural link patterns. Expired-domain abuse, where an old domain’s authority is repurposed to prop up unrelated content, is called out in Google’s policies for the same reason.

This does not mean all paid promotion is forbidden. Google itself acknowledges that buying and selling links for advertising and sponsorship is a normal part of the web, provided those links do not pass ranking credit. The honest treatment of this topic, including where paid links are legitimate and where they cross the line, is something we cover in our guide to buying backlinks safely and where the risks lie. The distinction is not whether money changes hands; it is whether you are trying to buy rankings by passing credit through links that should be tagged as sponsored.

The broader framing is the difference between white-hat and black-hat link building. White-hat methods earn links by being worth linking to; black-hat methods try to trick the algorithm. The former compound and survive updates, while the latter carry the constant risk of a manual action or an algorithmic hit, and any gains tend to be temporary. A word on so-called toxic links, because there is a lot of myth here. Google has stated repeatedly that its systems are designed to ignore the vast majority of spammy or low-quality links they encounter, which is why the disavow tool is genuinely unnecessary for most sites and should be a last resort used only where there is a manual action tied to links you caused. The sensible posture is not to obsess over every low-quality link pointing at you, but to run a periodic backlink audit so you understand your own profile, keep building genuine links, and let Google’s systems do the discounting they are built to do.

Your off-page SEO roadmap

Off-page SEO rewards a sequence, not a scramble. The roadmap below is the order we follow with clients, and it works because each step makes the next more effective.

Start by making sure you deserve links. Audit your best pages and confirm they are genuinely worth referencing; if your content is not as good as what already ranks, fix that first, because outreach for mediocre pages is wasted effort. Next, understand your starting position: benchmark your referring domains and authority against the competitors already ranking, and study their link profiles to see what a winning profile looks like in your market. This gap analysis turns off-page SEO from guesswork into a target.

With that baseline set, build your foundational assets: the studies, guides, tools and data that give people a reason to link and journalists a reason to cover you. Then run outreach and digital PR against those assets, combining the tactics that suit your niche, from guest contributions and resource or broken-link outreach to reactive commentary and PR campaigns, while keeping your anchor text and link mix natural throughout. In parallel, capture the quick wins: reclaim unlinked mentions, recover lost links, and, for local businesses, get your Business Profile, citations and reviews in order.

Finally, measure, learn and repeat. Track referring domains from quality sources, keyword visibility, referral traffic and AI citations quarter by quarter, double down on the tactics earning the best links, and drop the ones that are not. Off-page SEO is a compounding programme, not a project with an end date, and the brands that win are the ones that keep showing up. If this feels like a lot to run in-house, it is, which is why many businesses bring in specialist help for the outreach and PR-heavy parts while keeping content and strategy close. Whichever route you choose, the principles are the same: build something worth referencing, earn recognition from the sites and people who matter, keep the profile natural, and give it time. Do that consistently and off-page SEO stops being a mystery and becomes your most durable competitive advantage.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between off-page and on-page SEO?

On-page SEO is everything you optimise on your own pages, such as the content, headings, internal links and structured data, while off-page SEO is the external signals that point back to you, such as backlinks, brand mentions, reviews and PR coverage. On-page and technical SEO make a page eligible to rank; off-page authority largely decides how high it climbs for competitive queries.

Are backlinks still a ranking factor in 2026?

Yes. Backlinks remain one of the strongest signals Google uses, and large-scale studies continue to find that pages with more quality referring domains rank higher. What has changed is the emphasis on quality and relevance: a handful of genuinely editorial links from trusted, on-topic sites now outweigh large volumes of low-quality ones, and manipulative links are discounted or penalised.

Do social media signals help SEO?

Not directly. Likes, shares and follower counts have never been confirmed as direct Google ranking factors. They still matter indirectly, because social distribution puts your content in front of the people who link and cite, and it builds the branded demand that is a genuine signal of prominence. Treat social as amplification, not a ranking lever.

How long does off-page SEO take to work?

Longer than most other channels. Earning quality links and coverage takes time, and the ranking impact usually appears over months rather than weeks, often in steps rather than a smooth curve. Digital PR coverage can land long after a pitch. Judge off-page programmes on quarters, and expect the value to compound as your authority grows.

Does off-page SEO matter for AI search and tools like ChatGPT?

Increasingly, yes. AI answer engines cite a small number of sources and lean on the same reputation cues as search: which brands are frequently mentioned, linked and cited around a topic. Google has said there is no separate optimisation required for its AI features beyond the fundamentals, so the off-page authority you build for search is the same authority that earns AI citations.

Is buying links against Google’s rules?

Buying or selling links that pass ranking credit is a violation of Google’s spam policies. Paid and sponsored links are fine when they are tagged correctly so they pass no ranking credit. The risk is not that money changes hands, but that you are trying to buy rankings through links that should be marked as sponsored. Focus your budget on earning links you deserve.